Does modern life ever feel excruciatingly flat to you? A bleak landscape devoid of layers, rhythm, interest, texture?
Are you ever haunted by the question â€œIs this all there is?â€
Have you ever looked at an old photo and felt that the scene held such an inexplicable richness that it seemed you could practically step right into it?
The barren flatness of modern life is rooted in many things, including mindless consumerism, the absence of significant challenges, and the lack of shared values and norms, or even shared taboos to rebel against. But what is the solution?
Many would be quick to say faith, or philosophy, or relationships. All good answers.
But what is it that vivifies beliefs to the extent they can transform your perspective not simply for an hour on Sunday, but also in the mundane moments throughout your week? What can move an understanding of abstract truths from your mind into your very sinews? What can transform superficial ties with others into deep and meaningful bonds?
The answer I would suggest is ritual.
Our modern world is nearly devoid of daily rituals â€“ at least in the way we traditionally think of them. Those that remain â€“ such as ones that revolve around the holidays, loved ones and daily practices â€“ have largely lost their transformative power and are often endured more than enjoyed, participated in as an obligatory going through of the motions. Ritual has today become associated with that which is rote, empty, meaningless.
Yet every culture, in every part of the world, in every era has engaged in rituals, suggesting they are a fundamental part of the human condition. Rituals have even been called our most basic form of technology â€“ they are a mechanism that can change things, solve problems, perform certain functions, and accomplish tangible results. Necessity is the mother of invention, and rituals were born out of the clear-eyed perspective that life is inherently difficult and that unadulterated reality can paradoxically feel incredibly unreal. Rituals have for eons been the tools humans have used to release and express emotion, improve their well-being, build their personal identity and the identity of their tribe, create a sense of belonging, bring order to chaos, orient themselves in time and space, affect real transformations, and bring layers of meaning and texture to their lives. When rituals are stripped from our existence, and this fundamental human longing goes unsatisfied, restlessness, apathy, alienation, boredom, rootlessness, and anomie are the result.
The Rites of Manhood
In the coming year we plan to do in-depth posts on some of the simple rituals that have been most central to the meaning and making of manhood, such as rites of passage, initiations, and oaths. This week we will be laying the foundation for these posts in two articles; the first will set up a definition of ritual, and the second will explore the many ways rituals are so vital for a full and meaningful life.
Today weâ€™ll provide a little context as to the nature of ritual and why it has largely disappeared from modern societies and daily life.
What Is Ritual?
According to Catherine Bell, professor of ritual studies and author of the preeminent textbook on the subject, ritual has been traditionally defined as an action that lacks a â€œpractical relationship between the means one chooses to achieve certain ends.â€ For example, shaking hands when you meet someone can be considered a ritual as there is no real reason why grabbing anotherâ€™s hand and shaking for a second or two should lead to acquaintanceship. It is a culturally-relative gesture; we might very well greet each other with a pat on the shoulder or even no physical contact at all. As another example, washing your hands to clean them is not a ritual since there exists a clear practical relationship between your action and the desired result. But if a priest splashes water on his hands to â€œpurifyâ€ them, thatâ€™s a ritual and spiritual practice, since the water is largely symbolic and not really meant to rid the hands of bacteria.
Bell lists six attributes of rituals:
- Formalism: This is a quality rooted in contrast and how restrictive or expressive the accepted code of behavior is for a given event/situation. For example a backyard picnic is very casual and will not feel like a ritual because there are few guidelines for how one may express oneself. A very formal dinner, on the other hand, has a more limited range of accepted behaviors and thus can feel quite ritual-like. Bell argues that while we sometimes see formality as stuffy, since it curbs more spontaneous expression, formalized activities are not â€œnecessarily empty or trivialâ€ and â€œcan be aesthetically as well as politically compelling, invoking what one analyst describes as â€˜a metaphoric range of considerable power, a simplicity and directness, a vitality and rhythm.â€™ The restriction of gestures and phrases to a small number that are practiced, perfected, and soon quite evocatively familiar can endow these formalized activities with great beauty and grace.â€
- Traditionalism. Rituals are often framed as activities that carry on values and behaviors that have been in place since an institutionâ€™s creation. This link to the past gives the ritual power and authority and provides the participant with a sense of continuity. The ritual may simply harken to those who came before, as when university graduates don the gowns that were once typical everyday classroom wear for scholars, or it may actually seek to recreate a founding event â€“ as in the American celebration of Thanksgiving.
- Disciplined invariance. Often seen as one of the most defining features of ritual, this attribute involves â€œa disciplined set of actions marked by precise repetition and physical control.â€ Think of soldiers marching in drill step or the sit/stand/kneel pattern followed by Catholics during the course of a Mass. Disciplined invariance suppresses â€œthe significance of the personal and particular moment in favor of the timeless authority of the group, its doctrines, or its practices,â€ and â€œsubordinates the individual and the contingent to a sense of the encompassing and the enduring.â€
- Rule-governance. Rituals are often governed by a set of rules. Both war and athletics are examples of activities that can be quite ritual-like when their rules regulate what is and is not acceptable. Rules can both check and channel certain tensions; for example, the game of football channels masculine aggression into a form of ritualized and controlled violence. On occasion the rules fail to sufficiently check the tension that is always bubbling right at the surface, as when a chaotic brawl breaks out amongst players. That the game reflects a similar submerged tension within society at large is part of why the audience finds the ritual so compelling.
- Sacral symbolism. Ritual is able to take ordinary or â€œprofaneâ€ objects, places, parts of the body, or images, and transform them into something special or sacred. â€œTheir sacrality,â€ Bell writes, â€œis the way in which the object is more than the mere sum of its parts and points to something beyond itself, thereby evoking and expressing values and attitudes associated with larger, more abstract, and relatively transcendent ideas.â€ Thus something like incense can be a mere mixture of plants and oils designed to perfume a room, or, when swung from a censer in a sacred space, can represent the prayer of the faithful ascending into heaven.
- Performance. Performance is a particular kind of action â€“ one that is done for an audience. A ritual always has an intended audience, even if that audience is God or oneself. Tom F. Driver, a professor of theology, argues that â€œperformanceâ€¦means both doing and showing.â€ It is not a matter of â€œshow-and-tell, but do-and-show.â€ Human are inherently actors, who wish to see themselves as characters in a larger narrative, and desire the kind of drama inherent in every timeless tale. Rituals function as narrative dramas and can satisfy and release this need. In the absence of ritual, people resort to doing their “showing” on social media and creating their own drama â€“ often through toxic relationships or substances.
The more of these attributes a behavior/event/situation invokes, the more different from everyday life and ritual-like it will seem. The fewer of these attributes present, the more casual and ordinary it will feel.
For a more simple definition of ritual, hereâ€™s one that works: thought + action. A specific ritual consists of doing something in your mind (and often feeling something in your heart), while simultaneously connecting it to doing something with your body in a series of actions.
Such rituals fall into a wide variety of categories. Theorist Ronald Grimes lists 16 of them:
- Rites of passage
- Marriage rites
- Funerary rites
- Civil ceremonies
- Rituals of exchange (as in worshipers making sacrifices to the gods in hope of receiving blessings from the divine)
- Healing rites
- Interaction rites
- Meditation rites
- Rites of inversion (rituals of reversal, where violating cultural norms is temporarily allowed, as in men dressing like women)
- Ritual drama
The important thing to understand about rituals is that they are not limited to very big, very formal events. Rituals can in fact be large or small, private or public, personal or social, religious or secular, uniting or dividing, conformist or rebellious. Funerals, weddings, presidential inaugurations, church services, baptisms, fraternal initiations, and tribal rites of passage are all rituals. Handshakes, dates, morning routines, greetings and goodbyes, tattoos, table manners, your morning jog, and even singing the Happy Birthday song can be rituals as well.
In many traditional societies, almost every aspect of life was ritualized. So why is there such a dearth of rituals in modern culture?
The embrace of ritual in the Western World was first weakened by two things: the Protestant Reformation’s movement against icons and ceremonialism and the Enlightenmentâ€™s emphasis on rationalism.
Historian Peter Burke, argues â€œthe Reformation was, among other things, a great debate, unparalleled in scale and intensity, about the meaning of ritual, its functions and its proper forms.â€ Many Protestants concluded that the kind of rituals the Catholic Church practiced gave too much emphasis to empty, outward forms, rather than oneâ€™s internal state of grace. They rejected the â€œmagical efficacyâ€ of rites to be able to do things like change bread and wine into the literal body and blood of Christ.
The magical efficacy of ritual was attacked from the other side by Enlightenment thinkers. As discussed above, ritual is inherently nonrational since there is no practical relationship between the action and the end result. It is not rational to think that painting oneâ€™s body before battle will offer protection, that a rite of passage can turn a boy into a man, or that smoking a peace pipe can seal a treaty. Thus, ritual began to be associated with the superstitions of primitive peoples.
Suspicion of ritual again grew after World War II, in the wake of the way in which ritual ceremonies had been used to solidify loyalty to the Nazi cause.
Cultural embrace of ritual then really began to unravel during the social movements of the 1960s, which emphasized free expression, personal freedom, and individual emotional fulfillment above all. Rituals — which prescribe certain disciplined behaviors in certain situations, and require a person to forfeit some of their individuality in service to the synchrony and identity of the group — constrain spontaneity and the ability to do whatever one pleases. Ritual thus came to be seen as too constraining and not sufficiently “authentic.”
For these reasons, the use of and participation in rituals, including healthy rituals, has been greatly curtailed. Or perhaps as historian Peter Burke argues, weâ€™ve just replaced old rituals with new ones: â€œIf most people in industrial societies no longer go to church regularly or practice elaborate rituals of initiation, this does not mean that ritual has declined. All that has happened is the new types of ritualsâ€”political, sporting, musical, medical, academic and so onâ€”have taken the place of the traditional ones.â€ But the new rituals â€“ watching sports, attending music festivals, checking Facebook, shopping, visiting a strip club on your 18th birthday — are light on nourishment and do not satisfy. Traditional rituals provided a mechanism by which humans could channel and process that which was difficult to grapple with â€“ death, maturation, aggression â€“ allowing the participant to discover new truths about themselves and the world. New rituals, if they can even really be called such, attempt to deny anything ugly in life (lest that lead you to close your wallet) and present a shiny, glossy faÃ§ade — â€œconfetti cultureâ€ â€“ that facilitates passive consumption and turning away from examining given assumptions.
In our next post, we will argue that despite the cultural disdain for simple ritual, it is a human art form and practice which should be revived to experience the benefits of rituals. It is true that ritual can be used for good or for ill, yet its benefit is so great that fear of the bad should not lead us to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Even if a man sees no place for his own ritual in his faith or superstitious rituals, he can have great use for it in other areas in his life (indeed, if his faith is completely unritualized, he has all the more need for other kinds of rituals). We will argue that even the most rational man might make room in his life for some â€œmagic,â€ and that while ritual may seem constraining, it can paradoxically be incredibly empowering and even liberating for the wellbeing and mental health of men. How that might be so, is where we will turn next time.
Listen to our podcast with William Ayot on a man’s need for ritual:
Read the Entire Series:
The Rites of Manhood: Manâ€™s Need for Ritual
The Power of Ritual: The Creation of Sacred Time and Space in a Profane World
The Power of Ritual: Building Shared Worlds and Bonds That Transcend the Everyday
The Power of Ritual: The Rocket Booster of Personal Change, Transformation, and Progress
The Nature and Power of Ritual Series Conclusion: On Ritual Resistance
Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions by Catherine Bell
Liberating Rites: Understanding the Transformative Power of Ritual by Tom F. Driver